(no subject)
May. 5th, 2006 01:17 pmFUCK fuck fuck fuck they've elected in a BNP counsellor in Barking. Fuck. Fuckit. Fuck.
Fuck. Fuck I don't want to go back. That actually makes the idea of going home more than a little scary. BNP voting neighbours. Fuckit.
(Not actually my constituency, but the boundary's about three doors down the road....)
ETA: Eleven out of thirty-nine counsellors in Barking. And a new BNP counsellor in my home constituency too, too...
knew I should have committed electoral fraud
*spits*
Fuck. Fuck I don't want to go back. That actually makes the idea of going home more than a little scary. BNP voting neighbours. Fuckit.
(Not actually my constituency, but the boundary's about three doors down the road....)
ETA: Eleven out of thirty-nine counsellors in Barking. And a new BNP counsellor in my home constituency too, too...
*spits*
no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 04:17 pm (UTC)That would be a fair assumption to make based upon our current political system. ;-)
I think that the article does make a useful point that re-phrasing what one has to say will assist people in understanding it. Because of these 'vibes' I have great difficulty in explaining to anyone what libertarians are interested in. For example, if I say "the welfare state has failed the poor by keeping them trapped in poverty, we should abandon it" they hear "f**k the poor", and so on.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 04:24 pm (UTC)Yeah, well, that's why it's so fucking creepy. God don't people think *growls*
if I say "the welfare state has failed the poor by keeping them trapped in poverty, we should abandon it" they hear "f**k the poor", and so on.
Mostly I just think 'can't see another way working any better...' I think the welfare state is fixable.
But then you knew that already.